Having read the ending already. 'Both a these nuts' is actually even more correct than the 'you dad' he originally said.
Also gotta love the irony of having to wait so excessively long for the punchline, then seeing a logo of 'short shorts'.
Having read the ending already. 'Both a these nuts' is actually even more correct than the 'you dad' he originally said.
Also gotta love the irony of having to wait so excessively long for the punchline, then seeing a logo of 'short shorts'.
animation was awesome.
Choice of music was awful.
Good lord Harry. To be frank, I didn't like the first one that much (loved the animation, just wasn't that funny to me, compared to your other works). But this one was just so furiously silly, that I dare say, its almost so good of a sequel, that its betterly sequeled than Shrek 2 was, compared to it's debut. (I know 'betterly sequeled' aren't actual words, but I had no better way of saying that).
Or maybe it just hit me harder because I was expecting the new Starbarians, instead of this beautifully-charming looking mess of random humor.
Sum gud animation rite there.
The art style looks really charming, a bit like the game Don't Starve in black & white, but from a sideview instead of top-down.
Only nitpick would be that the text bubbles are sometimes a little hard to read with long sentences, might be a good idea to chop up some sentences here and there and split those into multiple text bubbles.
I can’t really edit it currently I’ll take that into consideration when I can animate stuff again
I approve this message.
I wish I could work in a restaurant like that, whenever a customer asks for something bothersome: 'No requests! You get what you are given!'. And then that would be that!
And despite all of the weird and creepy stuff, there's probably a good handfull of metaphors and live lessons to be taken out of this video, but you better try reeeealy hard to look past the creepyness.
Though one thing that puts me at ease, is that no trousers were dropped for using that handy-mouth.
I feel Jod's struggles. People in my country always pronounce my first letter like *insert TV-static-noise here* instead of the 'guh' sound.
Watched the whole thing in a confused state, then saw the link to the behind-the-scenes, then sporadically watched some parts again. And I still can't believe it's actually stop-motion.
I've animated for quite a few years (though just 2d and pixelated stuff in Flash), so I'd like to think I've develloped a bit of an animator's eye. But that eye still tells me: 'nah dude, things look way too pretty, and the camera & characters move way to fluidly to be stop-motion'. Not just because of the framerate, but the whole movement of the characters.
Especially early on, in that super crowded scene, even all of the insignificant looking background characters move so organically, and just so many of them, moving around the place.
And don't even get me started on the action scenes, with all of the tumbling around and crazy shooting about, wich I think you really got crafty with, customising those mangled and bent arms for the more crazy acrobatics.
I basically went in my head, like Vegeta being a little bitch throughout 2nd half of the Freeza saga, going: "uuurgh, it can't be, that's impossible! He must be a super *something*".
So wich one do you think you should pursue? <_< The cute one with the 'you know...' or one with the considerable aesthetic qualities?
The one with the 'you know'? What does THAT mean!? O_O
No, I'm not THAT happy to see you. It's just a DS in my pocket. ....Calm down..
Age 33, filthy Mayonaise Blaster
Intermediate-Hard Knocks
Joined on 5/23/08